Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Seven Network Limited [2005] FCA 1851 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – preliminary discovery – O 15A r 3 of the Federal Court Rules – applicants seeking orders to identify a respondent – reasonable inquiries – likelihood of respondents having knowledge of the facts or possession of relevant documents – strength of applicants' case – interests of justice
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 6, 52, 65A Federal Court Rules, O 15A rr 3, 6
CGU Insurance Ltd v Malaysia International Shipping Corporation Berhad (2001) 187 ALR 279 discussed Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 1 applied John Fairfax & Sons Limited v Cojuangco (1988) 165 CLR 346 cited Levis v McDonald (1997) 75 FCR 36 cited Stewart v Miller [1979] 2 NSWLR 128 cited
australian broadcasting corporation and zapruder's other films pty limited v seven network limited and channel seven sydney pty limited NSD 1556 OF 2005 STONE J 16 DECEMBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1556 OF 2005
BETWEEN: australian broadcasting corporation
FIRST APPLICANT
zapruder's other films pty limited
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: seven network limited
FIRST RESPONDENT
channel seven sydney pty limited
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 DECEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The second respondent make discovery to the applicants of all documents which are or have been in their possession relating to the name, place of residence, place of business and occupation of:
(a) the producer or producers; the reporter or reporters; and the editor or editors responsible for the 'Australian Idol' segment of the Today Tonight program broadcast by the second respondent on 10th August 2005 on Channel 7; and
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate