Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZBMC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1882
MIGRATION – application for a protection visa – whether Tribunal failed to consider an issue – whether Tribunal complied with requirements of s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where similarities between appellant's statement and statements of other visa applicants who had the same migration adviser – whether similarities were part of the reason for Tribunal affirming decision under review. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend notice of appeal – whether expedient in the interests of justice to grant leave to amend.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424A Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 cited In Marriage of F (2001) 161 FLR 189 cited Ling v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1069 distinguished Minogue v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1999) 84 FCR 438cited SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 215 ALR 162referred to SZDQL v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 769 referred to VAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 206 ALR 471 cited VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 cited
SZBMC v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1182 of 2005 BRANSON J 21 DECEMBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1182 of 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZBMC
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate