Rangott v Pilor Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1909

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Rangott v Pilor Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1909 WILLIAM BALFOUR RANGOTT v PILOR PTY LIMITED, JANELLE ROCHE, PIA SERVICES PTY LTD, MAYHEM GAMES PTY LTD, FAIRCHROME PTY LTD, MANO MANAGEMENT PTY LTD, MARK & NOORAINI BLUMER, IPAQ PTY LTD, KEN OWEN, SANETH WEERATNE, CRDT PTY LTD AND AAR INVESTMENTS PTY LTD QUD 137 of 2005 DOWSETT J 21 OCTOBER 2005 BRISBANE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD 137 OF 2005

BETWEEN: WILLIAM BALFOUR RANGOTT

APPLICANT

AND: PILOR PTY LIMITED

FIRST RESPONDENT

JANELLE ROCHE

SECOND RESPONDENT

PIA SERVICES PTY LTD

THIRD RESPONDENT

MAYHEM GAMES PTY LTD

FOURTH RESPONDENT

FAIRCHROME PTY LTD

FIFTH RESPONDENT

MANO MANAGEMENT PTY LTD

SIXTH RESPONDENT

MARK & NOORAINI BLUMER

SEVENTH RESPONDENT

IPAQ PTY LTD

EIGHTH RESPONDENT

KEN OWEN

NINTH RESPONDENT

SANETH WEERATNE

TENTH RESPONDENT

CRDT PTY LTD

ELEVENTH RESPONDENT

AAR INVESTMENTS PTY LTD

TWELFTH RESPONDENT

JUDGE: DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER: 21 OCTOBER 2005

WHERE MADE: BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The statement of claim as against the sixth and seventh respondents be struck out. 2. The applicant pay the costs of the sixth and seventh respondents incurred as a consequence of the delivery of the statement of claim in its present form and the costs of the motion. 3. The statement of claim as against the ninth respondent, be struck out, with leave to re-plead. 4. Costs as between the applicant and the ninth respondent be reserved. 5. The statement of claim as against the tenth respondent be struck out. 6. The applicant pay the tenth respondent's costs thrown away as a consequence of delivery of the statement of claim and of the motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.