Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jain v Deojill Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2005] FCA 1938
ASHISH JAIN v DEOJILL PTY LTD (IN LIQ) & ANOR NSD1958 OF 2005 EMMETT J 2 DECEMBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD1958 OF 2005
BETWEEN: ASHISH JAIN
APPLICANT
AND: DEOJILL PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)
FIRST RESPONDENT
STEPHEN J PARBERY
SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 DECEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
Upon the undertaking of the Applicant, given by his solicitor, to procure payment of the following amounts to each of the following creditors of the first respondent on 2 December 2005 by way of loan to the first respondent; namely:
1. Australian Taxation Office $24,320.71;
2. Energy Australia Limited $963.75;
3. Office of State Revenue $625.65.
THE COURT:
1. Orders, pursuant to sub-section 482(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, that the winding up of the first respondent (ordered by this Court in proceedings NSD1331/2005 on 9 September 2005) be terminated with effect from 2 December 2005.
2. Orders, pursuant to sub-section 482(3) of the Corporations Act 2001, that the applicant thereafter resume control of the first respondent as its sole director and secretary.
3. Notes, and the Second Respondent acknowledges, that that Second Respondent has received payment sufficient to satisfy the costs and expenses of the liquidator relating to this application and of the winding up, being the following amounts:
a) Prentice Parbery Barilla (Liquidator) $4,716.28;
b) Blake Dawson Waldron (Solicitors for the Liquidator) $4,000.00;
c) Prentice Parbery Barilla (Liquidator) $195.65.
1. Otherwise dismisses the proceedings and makes no order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate