Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WALT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 42 MIGRATION – protection visa – refusal - application for review – claim based on alleged religious conversion at age 11 considered when applicant aged 17 – Tribunal not in error in asking the wrong questions in relation to conversion and taking into account irrelevant considerations – Tribunal did not fail to ask to consider whether applicant had well-found fear of being persecuted by reason of being an apostate – Tribunal not in error in reaching conclusion on availability of state protection – no error in conclusions on relocation Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 NAIZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 37 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 SCAT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 76 ALD 625 WAEW of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 260 Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 105 FCR 548 WALT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL WAD 145 of 2005 NICHOLSON J 6 FEBRUARY 2006 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 145 OF 2005
BETWEEN: WALT
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate