Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant M221/2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 45 MIGRATION – application for protection visa refused by Refugee Review Tribunal – applicant then sought review under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application dismissed but no appeal lodged – two years after Refugee Review Tribunal's decision applicant sought constitutional writs in High Court – application withdrawn – identical application for constitutional writs filed again in High Court – matter remitted to Federal Court – whether applicant required to obtain order enlarging time – principles of res judicata, issue estoppel and Anshun estoppel – no jurisdictional error shown Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 referred to Re Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Marks (2000) 177 ALR 491 referred to Re Ruddock; Ex parte Reyes (2000) 177 ALR 484 referred to Thayananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1054 referred to APPLICANT M/221/2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS VID 525 OF 2004 WEINBERG J 3 FEBRUARY 2006 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 525 OF 2006
BETWEEN: APPLICANT M221/2003
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
Refugee Review Tribunal
SECOND Respondent
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 FEBRUARY 2006
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate