Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZDZQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Anor [2006] FCA 46
MIGRATION – no point of principle SZDZQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 2011 OF 2005 MOORE J 2 FEBRUARY 2006 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2011 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZDZQ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 FEBRUARY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed 2. The Refugee Review Tribunal be added as a respondent. 3. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs. 4. The first respondent's costs be fixed in the sum of $1500.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2011 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZDZQ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 2 FEBRUARY 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of a Federal Magistrate. The appeal was listed for directions in November 2005. When the appellant appeared, the matter was fixed for hearing for 9.30 am tomorrow. Subsequently, however, the hearing of the appeal was changed and fixed for hearing at 9 o'clock this morning. 2 The appellant was notified by letter at his address for service of the changed date. I have been informed by the solicitor appearing for the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs ("The Minister") that the appellant was informed again in early January of the new hearing date by a letter sent to his address for service, enclosing written submissions prepared on behalf of the Minister. 3 The matter has been called. There has been no appearance for the appellant. I have been asked to dismiss the appeal on the basis that the appellant has not appeared. I propose to do so. 4 I order the appeal be dismissed, and the appellant pay the respondent's costs. I order that those costs be fixed in the sum of $1500. I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate