Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZHDH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 64 SZHDH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 2276 OF 2005 MADGWICK J 6 FEBRUARY 2006 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2276 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZHDH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 FEBRUARY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed with costs assessed in the sum of $900. 2. The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as the second respondent.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2276 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZHDH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE: 6 FEBRUARY 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT HIS HONOUR: 1 This is an application for leave to appeal from a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court given on 17 November 2005. The applicant for leave was advised on 11 January 2006 that the case was fixed for hearing today at 10.15 am. It is now after 10.45 am and there is no appearance by the applicant. The first respondent asks that the proceeding be dismissed for want of prosecution of the proceeding with due diligence pursuant to Order 35A rules 2(1)(f) and 3(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules. 2 The proceedings in the court below were dismissed by the learned Magistrate as an abuse of process and for delay. The case for the applicant does not appear promising, to say the least of it, and it seems to me appropriate to dismiss the proceedings for non-prosecution with costs assessed, as asked, in the sum of $900. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate