Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 77 MIGRATION – application for extension of time within which to file and serve notice of appeal – whether delegate of Minister required to give particulars of "information" to applicant pursuant to s 57 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether fact that migration agent had informed Department that it no longer acted for applicant was "relevant information" – whether fact that Department had been unable to contact applicant was "relevant information" – application devoid of merit – extension of time refused
THI DONG THAO TRAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
VID 1229 OF 2005 WEINBERG J 10 FEBRUARY 2006 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1229 OF 2005
BETWEEN: THI DONG THAO TRAN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 FEBRUARY 2006
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondents' costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1229 OF 2005
BETWEEN: THI DONG THAO TRAN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE: 10 FEBRUARY 2006
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for an extension of time to enable the applicant to appeal against a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court given on 24 January 2005: Tran v Minister for Immigration (No 2) [2005] FMCA 412 ("Tran (No 2)"). On that date, McInnis FM dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of a delegate of the respondent Minister dated 6 November 2003. 2 The applicant did not file and serve a notice of appeal within the 21 day period provided for in O 52 r 15(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules. The Federal Magistrate was not asked to, and did not, fix any later date for that purpose, pursuant to O 52 r 15(1)(a)(iii). Nor did the applicant apply to this Court within the 21 day period for further time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal under O 52 r 15(1)(b). The applicant must therefore rely upon O 52 r 15(2), which provides that this Court may, at any time, "for special reasons" grant leave to file and serve a notice of appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate