Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZDQZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 130 SZDQZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1695 OF 2005 MADGWICK J 13 FEBRUARY 2006 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1695 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZDQZ
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 FEBRUARY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed with costs assessed in the sum of $4,000.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1695 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZDQZ
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE: 13 FEBRUARY 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT HIS HONOUR: 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court given on 29 August 2005 by Federal Magistrate Nicholls. His Honour dismissed an application to review a decision adverse to the appellant made by the Refugee Review Tribunal ('Tribunal'). The Tribunal's decision was made on 18 November 2002. It followed a rejection of the appellant's application for a protection visa by a delegate of the respondent Minister on 19 February 2002. 2 The Tribunal, in accordance with s 441G of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ('Act') duly sent notification of an invitation to the appellant to appear at a hearing, scheduled for 15 November 2002, to an 'authorised recipient', a migration agent engaged by the appellant. Section 441G(2) provides that if the Tribunal gives a document to the authorised recipient, the Tribunal is taken to have given the document to the applicant. However this does not prevent the Tribunal giving the applicant a copy of the document.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate