Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Smith v University of Ballarat [2006] FCA 148 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS – making of Australian Workplace Agreements – whether statements knowingly false and misleading – whether representations ongoing – whether effect limited by subsequent clarifications PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory injunction – whether appropriate in circumstances – whether serious question to be tried and balance of convenience favours grant – discretion to grant injunction – whether just and convenient – whether corrective statements sufficient - representative proceedings – remedies available to applicant – remedies available to represented group Re Federated Storemen and Packers Union of Australia; Ex parte Wooldumpers (Victoria) Limited (1989) 166 CLR 311 cited Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 cited King v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (2001) 184 ALR 98 cited Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618 cited American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 cited Australian Coarse Grain Pool Pty Ltd v Barley Marketing Board of Queensland (1983) 57 ALJR 425 cited Tableland Peanuts Pty Ltd v The Peanut Marketing Board (1984) 58 ALJR 283 cited Epitoma Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (1984) 3 FCR 55 cited Patrick Stevedores Operations (No 2) Proprietary Limited v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1 cited Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 1) (1985) 5 FCR 464 cited Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 cited Castlemaine Tooheys Limited v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148 cited Symington v Hoechst Schering Agrevo Pty Ltd (1997) 78 FCR 164 cited King v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [2000] FCA 1543 cited Schanka v Employment National (Administration) Pty Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 186 cited Finance Sector Union of Australia v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1999) 94 FCR 179 cited Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v G & K O'Connor Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 80 cited Burazin v Blacktown City Guardian Pty Ltd (1996) 142 ALR 144 cited Thomson v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 116 IR 186 cited Heptonstall v Gaskin (No 2) (2005) 138 IR 103 cited Finance Sector Union v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2000) 106 IR 139 cited SMITH v UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT VID 135 OF 2006 YOUNG J 24 FEBRUARY 2006 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate