Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Colorado Group Limited v Strandbags Group Pty Limited [2006] FCA 160 TRADE MARKS – proprietorship – first use – registration purportedly for article of a similar kind – geographical designation – whether descriptive – whether distinctive PASSING OFF – time for determining existence of cause of action – concurrent use – each party has reputation in mark – no misrepresentation TRADE PRACTICES – s 52 – confusion – not sufficient to establish claim – meaning Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 41, 88(2)(e) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Ainsworth v Walmsley (1866) 1 Eq 518 cited Arkwright v Newbold (1881) 17 Ch D 301 applied Barnsley Brewery Co Ltd v RBNB [1997] FSR 462 cited BP plc v Woolworths Ltd (2004) 62 IPR 545 discussed Cadbury-Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co Ltd [1981] RPC 429 applied Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks (1964) 111 CLR 511 cited Collins Co, The v Oliver Ames & Sons Corporation,18 F 561 (1882) cited Colman v Crump, 70 NY 573 (1877) cited Columbia Mill Company v Alcorn, 150 US 460 (1893) cited Edwards v Dennis (1885) 30 Ch D 454 cited Erven Warnink Besloten Vennootschap v J Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731 cited Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Ellis and Goldstein Ltd (1967) 116 CLR 254 discussed General Electric Co of USA v General Electric Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 729 cited Habib Bank Ltd v Habib Bank AG Zurich [1981] 1 WLR 1265 cited Hicks's Trade Mark, In re (1897) 22 VLR 636 cited Hudson's Trade-Marks, In re (1886) 32 Ch D 311 cited Irvine v Talkspot Ltd [2002] FSR 943 cited J B Palmer's Trade-Mark, In re (1883) 24 Ch D 504 cited J C Penney Company Inc v Penneys Ltd [1975] FSR 367 cited Jackson & Co v Napper (1886) 35 Ch D 160, 178 cited Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 563 applied Leather Cloth Co Ltd v American Leather Couch Co Ltd (1863) 4 De G J & S 137 cited Lee v Jones (1864) 17 CB (NS) 482 cited Marengo v Daily Sketch and Daily Graphic Ltd [1992] FSR 1 cited Peter Isaacson Publications v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (1984) 3 IPR 255 cited Pioneer Kabushiki Kaisha v Registrar of Trade Marks (1977) 137 CLR 670 cited Richards v Butcher [1891] 2 Ch 522 cited Royal Baking Powder Co, In re [1880] WN 49 cited Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Rohm & Haas Co (1949) 78 CLR 601 cited Shell Co of Australia Limited v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Limited (1963) 109 CLR 407 applied Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 followed Tattinger v Allbev Limited [1992] FSR 647 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate