Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 192
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – parties – application for leave to join additional respondents – substantive application seeking relief in respect of alleged contraventions of s 52 of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and for passing off – allegation by applicant of reputation in Australia in connection with common law mark 'mythbusters' – existing claim relating to production of 'mythbusters' television series – proposed new claim relating to publishing of two 'mythbusters' books – no connection between publishers of books sought to be added as respondents, and existing respondents – issue of applicant's reputation in Australia common to both television series claim and books claim – Federal Court Rules O 6 r 2 – whether rights to relief 'are in respect of or arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions'.
Federal Court Rules O 6 r 2
Bishop v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1990) ATPR–§41-060 cited Payne v Young (1980) 145 CLR 609 cited
ANDREW KNIGHT v BEYOND PROPERTIES PTY LTD & ORS NSD 131 of 2005 LINDGREN J 10 MARCH 2006 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 131 OF 2005
BETWEEN: ANDREW KNIGHT
APPLICANT
AND: BEYOND PROPERTIES PTY LTD (ACN 002 861 458)
FIRST RESPONDENT
BEYOND INTERNATIONAL LTD (ACN 003 174 409)
SECOND RESPONDENT
DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS INC
THIRD RESPONDENT
SPECIAL BROADCASTING SERVICE CORPORATION (SBS) (ABN 91 314 398 574)
FOURTH RESPONDENT
FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD (ACN 068 671 938)
FIFTH RESPONDENT
BEYOND PROPERTIES PTY LTD (ACN 002 861 458)
FIRST CROSS-CLAIMANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate