Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2006] FCA 199
COSTS – wasted – liability of applicant's solicitor – advancing case and raising constitutional challenge known, or ought reasonably to be known, not to be seriously arguable – conduct unreasonable – additional costs incurred – O 62 r 9(1)(c) of Federal Court Rules – s 43 of Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth)
Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules O 62 r 9(1)(c)
Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 77 referred to Levick v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 102 FCR 155 considered De Sousa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 41 FCR 544 referred to White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Flower & Hart (1998) 156 ALR 169 referred to Re Bendeich (No 2) (1994) 53 FCR 422 referred to Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 133 FCR 582 considered Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205 referred to Steindl Nominees Pty Ltd v Laghaifar [2003] 2 Qd R 683 referred to Bagshaw v Scott [2005] FCA 104 referred to
THI DONG THAO TRAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
VID 1229 OF 2005 WEINBERG J 10 MARCH 2006 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1229 OF 2005
BETWEEN: THI DONG THAO TRAN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 MARCH 2006
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Pursuant to O 62 r 9(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules, the applicant's solicitor repay to the applicant the sum of $1000 towards the costs which the applicant was ordered on 10 February 2006 to pay to the respondents. 2. Order 1 be fulfilled by the applicant's solicitor paying the sum of $1000 directly to the respondents on or before 9 May 2006. 3. The sum of $1000, when paid, be credited to the applicant by the respondents, and deducted from any costs that the applicant might otherwise be required to pay. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate