Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lactos Fresh Pty Ltd v Finishing Services Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 219
CONTRACT – whether notice given by landlord containing new rental assessment valid – whether notice unequivocal and did not leave reasonable recipient in doubt as to meaning – whether reasonable recipient credited with knowledge of terms of lease – whether subjective reaction of recipient of notice relevant – whether landlord's assessment required to be reasonable and not excessive – whether an implied duty of good faith TRADE PRACTICES – misleading or deceptive conduct – provision of assessment of proper rent – whether provision of assessment caused applicant's loss – unconscionable conduct – whether individual under a "special disadvantage" PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – amendment to pleadings – whether claim adequately pleaded – whether amendment should be allowed after conclusion of evidence – relevance of strength of case
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51AA, 52 and 82
Alcatel Australia Ltd v Scarcella (1998) 44 NSWLR 349 referred to Amalgamated Estates Ltd v Joystretch Manufacturing Ltd (1980) 257 EG 489 discussed Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Metro on George Pty Ltd (2004) 210 ALR 244 cited Australian Steel Company (Operations) Pty Ltd v Lewis (2001) 109 FCR 33 referred to Beneficial Finance Corporation v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1991) 31 FCR 523 referred to Burnham v City of Mordialloc [1956] VLR 239 cited Byrne v Australian Airlines Limited (1995) 185 CLR 410 cited Carradine Properties Ltd v Aslam [1976] 1 WLR 442 referred to Catley v Watson (1983) V ConvR ¶54-003 applied Central Pacific (Campus) Pty Ltd v Staged Developments Australia Pty Ltd (1998) V ConvR ¶54-575 discussed Davstone (Holdings) Ltd v Al-Rifai (1976) 32 P&CR 18 cited EFM Pty Ltd v New Zealand Steel (Aust) Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 290 cited Etlis v New Age Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 165 cited Fox & Widley v Guran [1998] 3 EG 142 discussed GHD Pty Ltd v Wayne [2001] QSC 73 discussed Gibbins Thomson Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Liverpool [2004] NSWSC 1172 cited GR Mailman & Associates Pty Ltd v Wormald (Aust) Pty Ltd (1991) 24 NSWLR 80 discussed Haynes v Top Slice Deli Pty Limited (1995) ATPR (Digest) ¶46-147 discussed Heaps v Addison Wesley Longman [1999] NSWSC 1093 cited Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 referred to Janssen-Cilag Pty Limited v Pfizer Pty Limited (1992) 37 FCR 526 discussed Lancecrest Limited v Asiwaju [2005] EWCA Civ 117 referred to Leotta v Public Transport Commission (NSW) (1976) 9 ALR 437 cited Lewis v Sydney Flour Pty Ltd (1956) 56 SR (NSW) 189 cited Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749 applied McCarthy v McIntyre [1999] FCA 784 discussed McCarthy v McIntyre [2000] FCA 1250 discussed McIntyre v Marshall [2004] NSWSC 412 cited Mercantile Mutual Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Farrington (1996) 44 NSWLR 634 cited MLW Technology Pty Ltd v May [2004] VSCA 29 cited National Australia Bank Ltd v Nobile (1988) 100 ALR 227 cited Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Tony Waller Ltd (1984) 270 EG 42 discussed Orion Pet Products Pty Ltd v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Vic) Inc (2002) 120 FCR 191 cited Ralph v Strutton [1969] Qd R 348 cited Rural Timber Ltd v Hughes [1989] 3 NZLR 178 referred to Shirlcar Properties Ltd v Heinitz (1983) 268 EG 362 discussed United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council [1978] AC 904 discussed Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate