Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFEZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 236
SZFEZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs AND Refugee Review Tribunal NSD 2205 OF 2005 JACOBSON J SYDNEY 10 MARCH 2006
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD2205 OF 2005
On appeal from a decision of Federal Magistrate Nicholls
BETWEEN: SZFEZ
APPELLANT
AND: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
FIRST RESPONDENT
Refugee Review Tribunal
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: Jacobson J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 March 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed pursuant to section 25(2B)(bb(ii) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth). 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD2205 OF 2005
On appeal from a decision of Federal Magistrate Nicholls
BETWEEN: SZFEZ
APPELLANT
AND: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
FIRST RESPONDENT
Refugee Review Tribunal
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: Jacobson J
DATE: 10 March 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of Federal Magistrate Nicholls given on 27 October 2005 dismissing an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal handed down on 10 November 2004. 2 The Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the appellant a protection visa. When the matter was called on for hearing this morning there was no appearance by the appellant. 3 Mr Smith of counsel who appears for the Minister informed me that his instructing solicitor had received a telephone call earlier this morning from the appellant stating that he was ill and unable to attend the hearing. Mr Smith asks me to dismiss the appeal for want of an appearance pursuant to my power under section 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth). 4 I am satisfied that the appellant was aware of today's hearing. He was present at a directions hearing on 8 December 2005 when the matter was listed and he signed consent orders on that date. 5 On 20 February 2006 my associate wrote to the appellant at the address for service given on the application confirming that the appeal had been listed for hearing before me today. 6 I am satisfied that I have power to make the order sought by the Minister. Accordingly, the order I make is that the appeal be dismissed with costs. I certify that the preceding six (6) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Jacobson.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate