Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emerald Ocean Distributors Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 244
TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – certain Slendertone products as existed in 2000 – orders following delivery of reasons for judgement – findings of fact appropriately in orders – no basis to include declarations not going to offending conduct – appropriateness of injunctions in absence of undertakings – inactivity of business not outweigh public interest in orders – limited possible effect on third party not preclude corrective orders Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 8 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A, 80A, 83, 86C, 86C(2)(b), 86C(4), 87, 87(1A) Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v 4WD Systems Pty Ltd (2003) 200 ALR 491 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Limited (No 2) [2003] FCAFC 163 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Danoz Direct Pty Ltd (2003) 60 IPR 296 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dell Computers Pty Ltd (2002) ATPR 41-878 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emerald Ocean Distributors Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 303 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emerald Ocean Distributors Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1703 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hartwich [2002] FCA 273 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Health Partners Inc (1997) 151 ALR 662 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v International Technology Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 37 IPR 573 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of WA Inc (1999) 95 FCR 114 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v The Tasmanian Salmonid Growers Association Ltd [2003] FCA 788 Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia Ltd v Switzerland Australia Health Fund Pty Ltd (1987) 78 ALR 483 Medibank Private Ltd v Cassidy (2002) 124 FCR 40 Mundine v Layton Taylor Promotions Pty Ltd (1981) ATPR 40-211 Trade Practices Commission v Santos Limited [1993] ATPR 41-221 AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v EMERALD OCEAN DISTRIBUTORS PTY LTD, SLENDERTONE HEALTH AND BEAUTY PTY LTD and SEAN O'DONOGHUE WAD 118 of 2000 NICHOLSON J 17 MARCH 2006 PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate