Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZEJU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 251 MIGRATION – whether the circumstances in connexion with which the holder of a temporary protection visa has been recognized as a refugee have ceased to exist – whether Refugee Review Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in not being satisfied that the appellant as an applicant for a permanent protection visa had a well-founded fear of persecution for a Convention reason
Convention relating to the Status of Refugees done at Geneva on 28 July 1951 as amended by the Refugees Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees done at New York on 31 January 1967 Articles 1A(2), 1C(5) QAAH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 145 FCR 363 distinguished Rajaratnam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 62 ALD 73 SZEJU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS & ANOR NSD 1207 of 2005 GRAHAM J 20 MARCH 2006 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1207 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A MAGISTRATE IN THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZEJU
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 MARCH 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed 2. The Appellant pay the First Respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1207 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A MAGISTRATE IN THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZEJU
APPELLANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate