Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lawrance v Chief Executive Officer, CRS Australia [2006] FCA 341 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("AAT") decision – application for documents under Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) – whether reasonable steps taken to locate documents – whether documents exist – whether findings of fact supported by evidence – whether irrelevant considerations taken into account – whether Wednesbury unreasonable ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – procedural fairness – whether reasonable opportunity to cross examine witnesses and make submissions – power of AAT to control proceedings – relevance to proceedings Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – ss 33(1), 44(1) Disability Services Act 1986 (Cth) – s 18 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) – ss 8, 11, 15 and 24A
Australian Postal Commission v Hayes (1989) 87 ALR 283 cited Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Saxby Bridge Financial Planning Pty Limited (2003) 133 FCR 290 cited Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 76 ALD 321 cited Lawrance v President, Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2005] FCA 79 referred to Lawrance v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2005] FCA 541 referred to Lawrance v President, Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2006] FCA 342 referred to Minh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 304 cited R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 cited TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 175 cited LAWRANCE v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CRS AUSTRALIA NSD 909 of 2005 JACOBSON J SYDNEY 5 APRIL 2006
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 909 of 2005
BETWEEN: AROHA LAWRANCE
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate