Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZESA v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 430 MIGRATION – no special or particular principle arising – abuse of process of the appellate procedure Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1
SZESA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 2391 OF 2005
CONTI J
20 APRIL 2006
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2391 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZESA
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 APRIL 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant to pay the Minister's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2391 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZESA
APPELLANT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE: 20 APRIL 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of Emmett FM given on 21 November 2005 whereby her Honour dismissed the appellant's application for review of the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision made on 13 October 2004 affirming the decision of the Minister's delegate earlier given on 15 March 2004 not to grant the appellant a protection visa. 2 The appellant, a citizen of Bangladesh, arrived in Australia on 7 November 2003, and on 18 December 2003 made application to the then Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs for a protection visa. That application was refused on 18 February 2004. On or about 15 March 2004, the appellant made application for review of the delegate's decision. Ultimately that application was refused by the Tribunal on 13 October 2004. On 15 November 2004, an application for review of the Tribunal's decision was filed in the Federal Magistrates Court, being an application which was followed by an amended application filed on 15 June 2004. 3 The appellant's claims made to the Tribunal included the following: (i) he was born in 1977 and lived in Feni in Bangladesh, where he received a total of 14 years of education; from 2000 to November 2003 he lived in the United Arab Emirates, and claimed to have owned an export-import company from 1998 to 2000, and an electrical and sanitary goods outlet after 2000;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate