Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Duncan v Lipscombe Child Care Services Inc [2006] FCA 458 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – strikeout application – whether s 31A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) applies to proceedings commenced before operation of section – termination of employment - breach of contract claims – whether subsequent Grievance Procedure formed part of contract of employment and applied to applicant – whether statements made at time of termination made in trade or commerce – whether unconscionable – whether, if federal claims struck out, jurisdiction for defamation claim Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51AA, 52 Federal Court Rules O 11 r 16, O 20 r 2 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1948) 78 CLR 62 cited General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) 1964 112 CLR 125 at 130 cited Rodway v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 515 applied Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 at 267 referred to Brambles Holdings Pty Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 at 177 cited Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corporation (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 at 11,1178 cited Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 applied Barto v GPR Management Services Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 389 distinguished Stoelwinder v Southern Health Care Network (2000) 177 ALR 501 distinguished Martin v Tasmania Development and Resources (1999) 163 ALR 79 applied Mulcahy v Hydro-Electric Commission (1998) 85 FCR 170 at 212-213 applied Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v C G Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (2003) 214 CLR 51 at [6]-[8], [42]-[46] cited Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 and Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 457 cited Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 457 cited Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 18 FCR 212 at 219 applied JANET IRENE DUNCAN v LIPSCOMBE CHILD CARE SERVICES INCORPORATED & ANOR TAD 50 of 2005 HEEREY J 28 APRIL 2006 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN HOBART)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate