Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Y v The University of Western Australia (No 2) [2006] FCA 466
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – suppression orders – University inquiry into allegations of serious misconduct ‑ allegations of sexual harassment – inspection of exhibits to affidavit
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 17(1), 17(4), 50 Federal Court Rules O 46 r 6(3), O 46 r 6(3)(a)
Herald & Weekly Times Ltd v Williams (2003) 130 FCR 435 applied Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 43 FLR 129 distinguished Johnston v Cameron (2002) 124 FCR 160 cited Johnston v Cameron [2002] FCA 948 followed Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 9) [2005] FCA 1394 applied Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 099 071 968) v Carey No 2 [2006] FCA 407 cited Macquarie Radio Network Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Authority [2002] FCA 1408 cited Y v THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA WAD 71 OF 2006 SIOPIS J 1 MAY 2006 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 71 OF 2006
BETWEEN: Y
APPLICANT
AND: THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SIOPIS J
DATE OF ORDER: 1 MAY 2006
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1 The order made by Siopis J on 24 March 2006 be discharged. 2 The orders made by Siopis J on 27 March 2006 be discharged. 3 The West Australian and The Australian newspapers be permitted to inspect the applicant's affidavit of 17 March 2006 and the exhibits thereto other than Exhibits MM‑1, MM‑2 and MM‑3. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 71 OF 2006
BETWEEN: Y
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate