Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Peto (No 1) [2006] FCA 474 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (ACN 123 123 124) v PETO & ORS NSD 731 OF 2003 ADVANCED SWITCHING SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 077 773 589) v STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES LIMITED (T/A COLONIAL STATE BANK) (ACN 003 963 228) NSD 88 OF 2001 RARES J SYDNEY 22 MARCH 2006
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 731 OF 2003
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
(ACN 123 123 124)
APPLICANT
AND: MICHAEL PAUL PETO
FIRST RESPONDENT
JOAN CHRISTINA BULMAN
SECOND RESPONDENT
BRYAN JOHN BULMAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
MARIE SAKLAOUI
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JOSEPHINE SAKLAOUI
FIFTH RESPONDENT
PAUL SUKKAR
SIXTH RESPONDENT
SCOTT HEYDE
SEVENTH RESPONDENT JUDGE: RARES J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 MARCH 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of today and the costs thrown away by reason of the amendment. 2. The costs thrown away by reason of the amendment (but not the costs of today) be payable forthwith, and taxed if agreement to their quantum is not reached. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 88 OF 2001
BETWEEN: ADVANCED SWITCHING SERVICES PTY LTD
(ACN 077 773 589)
APPLICANT
AND: STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES LIMITED (T/A COLONIAL STATE BANK)
(ACN 003 963 228)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RARES J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 MARCH 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate