Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Johnson & Johnson Pacific Pty Limited v Unilever Australia Limited [2006] FCA 486
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Gillette Australia Pty Ltd v Energizer Australia Pty Ltd [2002] 193 ALR 629 Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45 JOHNSON & JOHNSON PACIFIC PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 121 446) v UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ACN 004 050 828) NSD 751 OF 2006 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 2 MAY 2006
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 751 OF 2006
BETWEEN: JOHNSON & JOHNSON PACIFIC PTY LIMITED
APPLICANT
AND: UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LIMITED
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 MAY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. After 8 May 2006, the Respondent be restrained, pending the determination of the proceedings or further order, from broadcasting or communicating or causing or authorizing the broadcast or communication of the 30 second television commercial for Dove Summer Glow ("the Commercial") a copy of which is Exhibit "AH3" to the affidavit of Amethyst Marthe Hall affirmed 20 April 2006. 2. The costs of the Application for interlocutory re for interlocutory relief be costs in the cause.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 751 OF 2006
BETWEEN: JOHNSON & JOHNSON PACIFIC PTY LIMITED
APPLICANT
AND: UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LIMITED
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate