Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZWYY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 506 MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Magistrates Court – whether Refugee Review Tribunal was in error for failing to consider visa applicant's subjective state of mind – whether Tribunal was required to consider a claim not expressly raised by applicant – whether claim was apparent on the face of country materials before the Tribunal – appeal dismissed
SCAM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 964 followed WAHK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 81 ALD 22 followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 referred to Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 referred to Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 referred to NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) 144 FCR 1 discussed SVTB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 104 cited WAKZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1065 referred to Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 referred to MZWYY, MZWYZ AND MZWZA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL VID 155 OF 2006 KENNY J 8 MAY 2006 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 155 OF 2006
BETWEEN: MZWYY
FIRST APPELLANT
MZWYZ
SECOND APPELLANT
MZWZA
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate