Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dresna Pty Ltd v Linknarf Management Services Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2006] FCA 540
CONTRACT – agreement for the sale by respondents of supermarket business to applicant – sale conditional upon obtaining consent of landlord to assignment of lease – consent of landlord not obtained – separate agreement between applicant and respondents to commence proceedings against landlord – agreements terminated by respondents – whether respondents entered into agreement with third party for sale of supermarket while sale agreement with applicant still on foot – whether respondents sought approval from Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to sell supermarket to third party in breach of contractual obligations to applicant – whether respondents failed to disclose material information to applicant in breach of contractual obligations to applicant – whether breaches of contractual obligations, if any, caused applicant's loss or damage EQUITY – whether joint purpose of obtaining landlord's consent gave rise to a fiduciary relationship between applicant and respondents TRADE PRACTICES – whether respondents' lack of disclosure of material information amounted to misleading or deceptive conduct – whether respondents' conduct caused applicant's loss or damage
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 50, 52 and 82 Alcatel Australia Ltd v Scarcella (1998) 44 NSWLR 349cited BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council (1977) 180 CLR 266 referred to Central Exchange Ltd v Anaconda Nickel Ltd (2001) 24 WAR 382 cited Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 referred to Dresna Pty Ltd v Linknarf Management Services Pty Ltd (In Liq) formerly Franklins Management Services Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1011 referred to Dresna Pty Ltd v Misu Nominees Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1537 referred to Dresna Pty Ltd v Misu Nominees Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 169 referred to Garry Rogers Motors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Subaru (Aust) Pty Ltd (1999) ATPR ¶41-703 cited GEC Marconi Systems v BHP-IT (2003) 128 FCR 1 cited Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 referred to Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Airservices Australia (1997) 76 FCR 151 cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 cited Pacific Brands Sport & Leisure Pty Ltd v Underworks Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 288 cited Pacific Brands Sport & Leisure Pty Ltd v Underworks Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 40 referred to Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 cited Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596 cited Shepherd v Felt and Textiles of Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359 discussed United Dominions Corporation Ltd v Brian Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 1 cited R Meagher, D Heydon and M Leeming, Meagher Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines & Remedies (2002, 4th ed)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate