Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rangdon Pty Ltd v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [2006] FCA 546
TAXATION – appeal – whether assessment excessive – whether applicant can adopt facts stated by respondent without production of evidence and without respondent's concurrence – effect of adoption to confine appeal to issues of compliance with statutory preconditions – applicant not discharging burden of proof – respondent entitled to grant of motion for summary dismissal if non-compliance with discovery order Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 51(1), 166A, 170, 170(2)(b)(ii) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 8-1 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 14ZZ, 14ZZN, 14ZZO, 14ZZO(a), 14ZZO(b), 14ZZP Federal Court Rules O 15 r 8, O 20 r 2 Essenbourne Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 51 ATR 629 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco (1990) 168 CLR 614 Gauci v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 135 CLR 81 McAndrew v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 98 CLR 263
RANGDON PTY LTD v THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
WAD 88 of 2005
NICHOLSON J
12 MAY 2006
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 88 OF 2005
BETWEEN: RANGDON PTY LTD
(ACN 073 697 300)
APPLICANT
AND: THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 MAY 2006
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The respondent's notice of motion dated 14 March 2006 be allowed in accordance with the following orders and otherwise dismissed. 2. Pursuant to Order 15 rule 8 of the Federal Court Rules the applicant file and serve an affidavit stating whether any document, or any document of the class of documents, listed in the attached Schedule A is or has been in its possession, custody or power, and if it has but is not now in its possession, custody or power, when it parted with it and what has become of it. 3. In the event the applicant fails to comply with order 2 above within 28 days of the date of this order, the application be dismissed pursuant to Order 20 rule 2 of the Federal Court Rules. 4. The applicant pay the respondent's costs on the motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate