Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pedra Holdings Pty Ltd v Westfield Shoppingtown Carousel Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 552 COSTS – outstanding costs Dodd & Dodd Pty Ltd v Shire of Swan [1999] WASC 206 Homestyle Pty Ltd v Western Australian Builders, Labourers, Painters & Plasterers Union of Workers [2002] WASC 57 Pedra Holdings Pty Ltd v Westfield Shoppingtown Carousel Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 205 Pedra Holdings v Westfield [2005] FMCA 475 Peterson v Chubb Security Australia Pty Ltd [2003] FMCA 172 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-633
PEDRA HOLDINGS PTY LTD, MYRAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD, HENRY AVELING and MARIANNE AVELING v WESTFIELD SHOPPINGTOWN CAROUSEL PTY LTD, PT LIMITED, CPM (WA) PTY LTD and CPT MANAGER LIMITED
WAD 104 of 2005
NICHOLSON J
12 MAY 2006
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 104 OF 2005
BETWEEN: PEDRA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
ACN 064 183 222
FIRST APPLICANT
MYRAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD
ACN 009 105 408
SECOND APPLICANT
HENRY AVELING
THIRD APPLICANT
MARIANNE AVELING
FOURTH APPLICANT
AND: WESTFIELD SHOPPINGTOWN CAROUSEL PTY LTD
ACN 060 037 621
FIRST RESPONDENT
PT LIMITED
ACN 004 454 666
SECOND RESPONDENT
CPM (WA) PTY LTD
ACN 079 927 272
THIRD RESPONDENT
CPT MANAGER LIMITED ACN 054 494 307
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 MAY 2006
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: In addition to order 5 of 3 March 2006, which reads: '5. The first applicant pay the costs of the first and second respondents and the third and fourth respondents on the notice of motion and re-amended notice of motion respectively.' the second, third and fourth applicants: (a) pay the respondents' costs of the applications to strike out the applicants' statements of claim; (b) pay the third and fourth respondents' costs of the application to deconsolidate; (c) pay so much of the first and second respondents' costs of the application for security for costs as are attributable to the second, third and fourth applicants; (d) pay any other outstanding costs in relation to the notice of motion of the first and second respondents dated 3 February 2005 and the third and fourth respondents' re-amended notice of motion dated 21 December 2004.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate