Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Paras v Public Service Body Head of the Department of Infrastructure [2006] FCA 622 WORKPLACE RELATIONS – Victorian Public Service Agreement under Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – employment governed by Public Administration Act 2004 (Vic) – summary dismissal for serious misconduct – application for interlocutory injunction restraining employer from acting on purported dismissal – principles of grant of injunctive relief in context of employment relationship – whether serious question to be tried – whether balance of convenience and discretionary factors favour grant of injunction
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 661 Public Administration Act 2004 (Vic) ss 8, 20, 22, 33, 64 Public Administration (Review of Actions) Regulations 2005 (Vic)
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 cited Rankin v Marine Power International Pty Ltd (2001) 107 IR 117 cited Concut Pty Ltd v Worrell (2000) 176 ALR 693 cited Automatic Fire Sprinklers Pty Ltd v Watson (1946) 72 CLR 435 cited Hill v CA Parsons Ltd [1972] 1 Ch 305 followed Reilly v State of Victoria (1991) 5 VIR 1 followed Irani v Southampton & South West Hampshire Health Authority [1985] ICR 590 cited Dietman v Brent London Borough Council (1988) IRLR 299; [1987] ICR 737 considered
D Bean, Injunctions, 8th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004
KATE PARAS v PUBLIC SERVICE BODY HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE and STATE OF VICTORIA
VID 531 OF 2006
YOUNG J
19 MAY 2006
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 531 OF 2006
BETWEEN: KATE PARAS
APPLICANT
AND: PUBLIC SERVICE BODY HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE
FIRST RESPONDENT
STATE OF VICTORIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate