Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZWCL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 635 MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate – jurisdictional error – appellant claimed fear of persecution for political activities – Refugee Review Tribunal accepted some claims of assault, property damage and threats – Tribunal found no fear of future harm amounting to persecution – Tribunal held State-protection available – whether Tribunal misinterpreted the terms "well-founded fear" and "persecution". APPLICATION – leave to amend Notice of Appeal – journal article joint authored by presiding Tribunal member – article published after decisions of Tribunal and Federal Magistrate – article argued that State-sanctioned torture was morally justifiable in some circumstances – reasonable apprehension of bias – different notion of persecution than that required by law – whether new grounds of appeal had reasonable prospect of success.
Held (on appeal): Tribunal's evaluation of threats made and past harms in finding no persecution – revealed no jurisdictional error – State protection available in the circumstances in any event. Held (on application for leave): Content of journal article incapable of firmly establishing reasonable apprehension of bias – insufficient connection between the views expressed and the issues determined in the Tribunal – no demonstrable error in Tribunal's definition of refugee – no reasonable prospect of success. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36
Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 applied SZDWR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 36 cited VDAU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 32 applied Raheem v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 940 cited VBAS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2005) 216 ALR 307 applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 applied M66 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 112 applied Ratnayake v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1141 applied Applicant A233 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 666 cited Das v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2004) 208 ALR 229 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Respondent S152/2003 (2004) 205 ALR 487 applied SZBOT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 411 cited Applicant VFAH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1018cited O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310 applied Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 applied NAJT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 134 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Epeabaka (2001) 206 CLR 128 referred to Webb v R (1994) 181 CLR 41 followed R v Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 applied Re JRL; ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate