Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tower Software Engineering Pty Limited; Pendant Software Pty Limited v Harwood [2006] FCA 717
CORPORATIONS – interlocutory application to restrain defendant from taking any further step in a proceeding/application in the Takeovers Panel – interlocutory application for orders to dismiss or stay court proceeding – pre-emptive rights regime under company constitution – takeover offer – whether it is within discretion of directors to refuse to register acceptance of shares for reason that may prevent a higher bid – where application made to Takeovers Panel – whether same substratum of facts before Takeovers Panel and the Court – whether declaration by the Takeovers Panel would render proceeding in Court nugatory – role of the Takeovers Panel under the Corporations Act Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): ss 657A, 659AA, 659B, 1071F CSR Limited v Cigna Insurance Australia Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 345, considered National Mutual Holdings Pty Limited v Sentry Corporation (1989) 22 FCR 209, considered Sage v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2005] FCA 1043, cited Hammond v Commonwealth of Australia (1982) 152 CLR 188, considered Glencore International AG v Takeovers Panel (2005) 220 ALR 495, applied
IN THE MATTER OF TOWER SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 602 739)
PENDANT SOFTWARE PTY LIMITED (ACN 117 040 525) v MARTIN HARWOOD & ORS
VID 496 of 2006 GOLDBERG J 6 JUNE 2006 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 496 OF 2006
IN THE MATTER OF TOWER SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 602 739)
BETWEEN: PENDANT SOFTWARE PTY LIMITED (ACN 117 040 525)
PLAINTIFF
AND: MARTIN HARWOOD
FIRST DEFENDANT
BEREND HOFF
SECOND DEFENDANT
PETER JOHNSON
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate