Gap (ITM) Inc v Temporary Department Store Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 725

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Gap (ITM) Inc v Temporary Department Store Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 725 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – trade mark infringement claim – compromised by deed of settlement - no arguable defence

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 31A(1)(b) Migration Litigation Reform Act 2005 (Cth), Item 44 Pt 2 Sch 1 Trade Mark Act 1995 (Cth), s 120

Federal Court Rules, O 20 r 1, O 45 r 7

Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 referred to General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 referred to Geoffrey Inc v Luik (1997) 38 IPR 555 referred to Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 87 referred to Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 referred to Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 40 referred to Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 326 cited Rourke v Victorian Finance Guarantee and Share Co Ltd (1894) 20 VLR 8 referred to Evans Deakin & Co Pty Ltd v Kaiser Engineers and Constructors Inc [1968] Qd R 379 referred to Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 referred to Kammins Ballrooms Co Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd [1971] AC 850 referred to Reid v Interarch Australia Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1328 considered Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206 referred to GAP (ITM) INC and OLD NAVY (ITM) INC v TEMPORARY DEPARTMENT STORE PTY LTD (ACN 105 521 346), RICHMOND WHOLESALE PTY LTD (ACN 105 827 281), TIMOTHY SIMON DOUGLAS CLARK and RAMESH PARERA VID 112 OF 2005 KENNY J 9 JUNE 2005 MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 112 OF 2005

BETWEEN: GAP (ITM) INC

FIRST APPLICANT

OLD NAVY (ITM) INC

SECOND APPLICANT