Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Universal City Studios LLLP v Hoey trading as DVD Kingdom [2006] FCA 727 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – proceedings for infringement of copyright - no appearance or defence filed by the respondent – orders sought pursuant to O 35A of the Federal Court Rules by reason of default– whether restraining orders and other relief should be granted Held: Orders should be made. Federal Court Rules O 35A
Luna Park Sydney Pty Limited v Bose [2006] FCA 94 cited Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 36 cited Arthur v Vaupotic Investments Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 433 cited Chappell & Co Ltd v Associated Radio Co of Australia Ltd [1925] VLR 350 cited UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLLP v HOEY trading as DVD KINGDOM NSD 252 OF 2006 SACKVILLE J 9 JUNE 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 252 OF 2006
BETWEEN: UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLLP
FIRST APPLICANT
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION
SECOND APPLICANT
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES INC
THIRD APPLICANT
PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION
FOURTH APPLICANT
WARNER BROS PICTURES INTERNATIONAL [A DIVISION OF WARNER BROS PICTURES INC]
FIFTH APPLICANT
DISNEY ENTERTAINMENT INC
SIXTH APPLICANT
UNIVERSAL PICTURES (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LIMITED
(ACN 087 513 620)
SEVENTH APPLICANT
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX HOME ENTERTAINMENT SOUTH PACIFIC PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 412 679)
EIGHTH APPLICANT
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX HOME ENTERTAINMENT AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 076 486 470)
NINTH APPLICANT
COLUMBIA TRISTAR HOME ENTERTAINMENT PTY LTD (ACN 002 489 554)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate