Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pelka v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services
[2006] FCA 735
SOCIAL SECURITY – carer's payment – single rate – marriage-like relationship – factors relevant to assessment of marriage-like relationship – whether pooling of financial resources – finding by Tribunal of pooling – no evidence of pooling – apparent misconstruction by the Tribunal of relevant statutory criterion – error of law – question of marriage-like relationship otherwise finely balanced – Tribunal decision set aside – matter remitted to Tribunal to determine according to law WORDS AND PHRASES – 'marriage-like relationship', 'pooling of financial resources' Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 210, s 1064, s 4(2), s 4(3) Social Services Act 1947 (Cth) Lambe v Director-General of Social Services (1981) 57 FLR 262 cited Lynam v Director-General of Social Security (1983) 52 ALR 128 cited Staunton-Smith v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1991) 32 FCR 164 cited Cadman v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1993) 31 ALD 486 cited Garner v Repatriation Commission (1998) 53 ALD 297 cited Re: Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services and WAP [2000] AATA 7 cited New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
Sutherland P, Annotations to the Social Security Act 1991 (5th ed, Federation Press, 1998) Creyke R and Sutherland P, Veterans' Entitlements Law (Federation Press, 2000)
MARILYN PELKA v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES WAD 46 OF 2005 FRENCH J 14 JUNE 2006 PERTH IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 46 OF 2005
On Appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Constituted by Ms L. Savage-Davis
BETWEEN: MARILYN PELKA
Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate