Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFUO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 746 SZFUO AND ORS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND ANOR NSD 2498 OF 2005 RARES J 29 MAY 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2498 OF 2006
BETWEEN: SZFUO
SZFUP
SZFUQ (a minor by her next friend SZFUO)
SZFUR (a minor by his next friend SZFUO)
SZFUS (a minor by his next friend SZFUO)
SZFUT (a minor by her next friend SZFUO)
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RARES J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 MAY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellants to attend the hearing of the appeal today.
2. The appellants pay the first respondent's costs in the sum of $3000 in respect of the proceedings.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2498 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZFUO
SZFUP
SZFUQ (a minor by her next friend SZFUO)
SZFUR (a minor by his next friend SZFUO)
SZFUS (a minor by his next friend SZFUO)
SZFUT (a minor by her next friend SZFUO)
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RARES J
DATE: 29 MAY 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT) 1 On 8 February 2006 I fixed this matter for hearing on 26 April 2006. That hearing date was vacated and the matter was relisted for today. There has been no appearance by the appellants when the matter was called outside the court this afternoon. I have also noted the contents of the affidavit of the former solicitor for the appellants, Mr McNally, and the affidavit of Ms Griffin sworn today. 2 I am of opinion that in light of the fact that the appellants have not attended the hearing of the appeal I should make an order as sought by the first respondent pursuant to my power under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), namely, that I should dismiss the appeal for failure of the appellants to attend a hearing relating to the appeal, namely, the hearing of the appeal today. 3 The first respondent seeks an order for costs in the fixed sum of $3000. I am of opinion that that is a reasonable sum to seek in light of the facts that the matter has been fixed for hearing, considerable work has been done on the written submissions for the first respondent and the matter was ready to proceed today.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate