Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Laing v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2006] FCA 750
WILLIAM LAING (An inspector appointed pursuant to s 84(2)(a) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996) and NIGEL HADGKISS -v- CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and JOHN CUMMINS and S J HIGGINS PTY LTD and SHANE CHRISTOPHER SHEEDY
VID 895 of 2003
RYAN J
16 JUNE 2006
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 895 of 2003
BETWEEN: WILLIAM LAING (An inspector appointed pursuant to s 84(2)(a) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996)
First Applicant
NIGEL HADGKISS
Second Applicant
AND: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
First Respondent
AND JOHN CUMMINS
Second Respondent
AND S J HIGGINS PTY LTD
Third Respondent
SHANE CHRISTOPHER SHEEDY
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: RYAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 JUNE 2006
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The proceeding be dismissed in relation to any relief claimed against the fourth respondent Shane Christopher Sheedy ("Sheedy") personally.
2. The applicants have leave to file and serve, by 7 July 2006, a further amended application conforming generally with the draft further amended application filed on 8 July 2005 but further amended to take account of:
(a) the dismissal of the proceeding as against Sheedy ordered by paragraph 1 of this Order; and
(b) the reasons for judgment published this day.
3. The applicants have leave to file and serve, by 7 July 2006, a further amended statement of claim conforming generally with the draft further amended statement of claim filed on 8 July 2005 ("the fresh statement of claim") provided that:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate