Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZEGG v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 775 SZEGG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 577 OF 2005 STONE J 22 JUNE 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 577 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZEGG
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 JUNE 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as a respondent to this appeal. 2. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 577 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZEGG
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE: 22 JUNE 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of Federal Magistrate Lloyd-Jones in which his Honour dismissed an application to review a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. In a decision made on 30 July 2004 the Tribunal had affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent refusing to grant the appellant a protection (Class XA) visa. In accordance with the judgment of the High Court in SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 215 ALR 162, the Tribunal will be joined as the second respondent to the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate