Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZHBK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 805 MIGRATION – whether former s 425 of the Migration Act required more by way of notice of a proposed Tribunal hearing than compliance with former s 426 – whether shortcomings of an adviser to an applicant for review can affect the validity of a Tribunal decision on such a review – refusal of constitutional writ relief on discretionary grounds Held: (a) Tribunal's decision unaffected by jurisdictional error where notice of proposed hearing reached the appellant's adviser and the appellant failed to appear at the appointed time and place. (b) It would be inappropriate to interfere with the Federal Magistrate's refusal to order constitutional writ relief on discretionary grounds even if jurisdictional error was established, which was not the case in this matter.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 425, 426 Uddin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 165 ALR 243 SZAXF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 496 Freeman v Health Insurance Commission (2004) 141 FCR 129 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 215 ALR 162 at [80] SZHBK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS & ANOR NSD 198 of 2006 GRAHAM J 19 JUNE 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 198 of 2006
ON APPEAL FROM A MAGISTRATE IN THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZHBK
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 JUNE 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate