Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Keen v Telstra Corporation Limited [2006] FCA 834 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – jurisdictional error – taxation of costs – nature of review under s 69A Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether there exists a strong presumption in favour of the correctness of the decision from which the appeal was brought – AAT should give the correct and preferable decision on the material before it ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – jurisdictional error – taxation of costs – nature of review under s 67 Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) – whether second proceedings arising from the same factual matrix incidental to initial proceedings – an administrative decision involving jurisdictional error is no decision in law – where different interpretations exists an instrument should be interpreted so as to make it within power – ut res magis valeat quam pereat COSTS – goods and services tax – Federal Court Rules O 62 r 12 – scale of costs allowed for GST – GST not recoverable in addition to costs awarded Held: the Tribunal erred by failing to conduct a review under s 69A of the AAT Act on the basis of arriving at the correct and preferable decision; the Tribunal was correct in determining that the first Tribunal's decision was made without jurisdiction with respect to the 2002 proceedings; the Tribunal was correct in finding that Telstra was not liable to pay a sum in respect of GST in the amount of costs payable to Ms Keen under the first Tribunal's order for costs. A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 3, 69A Federal Court Rules O 62 r 12 Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act (No 1) 1995 (Cth) Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 4, 64, 67
Goods and Services Tax Ruling (GSTR 2001/4) Airservices Australia v Canadian Airlines International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 133 cited Attorney-General (NSW) v Stocks and Holdings (Constructors) Pty Ltd (1970) 124 CLR 262 cited Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation v The Commonwealth (1953) 94 CLR 621 cited Collins v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission (2005) 147 FCR 570 applied In re Florence Land and Public Works Company; Ex parte Moor (1878) 10 Ch D 530 cited Merringtons Pty Ltd v Luxottica Retail of Australia Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 16 June 2006) discussed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 applied Nominal Defendant v GLG Australia Pty Ltd (2006) 225 ALR 643 cited Plaintiff S157/2001 v The Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 cited Seyffer v Adamson (2001) 10 BPR 19,349 referred to The Queen v Portus; Ex parte City of Perth (1973) 129 CLR 312 cited Thornton v Apollo Nominees Pty Limited (2005) 59 ATR 244 discussed Widgee Shire Council v Bonney (1907) 4 CLR 977 cited Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (1996) 189 CLR 1 cited LA-RAINE LESLEY KEEN v TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED NSD 2528 OF 2005 RARES J 4 JULY 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate