Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant ABCD v Refugee Review Tribunal [2006] FCA 908 Freedom of Information – personal information of author of a document to which access is sought – where applicant claims to know identity of author of document – where applicant also engaged in proceedings in Refugee Review Tribunal – claims that documents sought affect the question of whether that applicant has been accorded procedural fairness in the RRT proceeding Held – no error in approach of Administrative Appeals Tribunal in its conclusion that the documents were exempt under the Freedom of Information Act.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) ss 41 and 45 Colakovski v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1991) 29 FCR 429 Commissioner of Police v the District Court of New South Wales and Perrin (1993) 31 NSWLR Corrs Pavey Whiting and Byrnes v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434. Kristoffersen v Department of Employment Workplace Relations and Small Business [2003] FCA 55 Re Kamminga and Australian National University (1992) 26 ALD 585 Sean Investments Pty Ltd v MacKellar (1981) 38 ALR 363 Ward v Centrelink [2005] FCA 73 APPLICANT ABCD OF 2005 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 580 OF 2005 ALLSOP J 20 JULY 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 580 of 2005
BETWEEN: APPLICANT ABCD
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 JULY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The proceeding stand over to 8 August 2006 to deal with the question of costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate