Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brown v Repatriation Commission [2006] FCA 914
VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – nature of appeal pursuant to s 44(1) of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – appeals on a question of law – review under s 5 of the ADJR Act – whether the Tribunal misunderstood evidence – 'kind of death' of veteran under Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) –whether denial of procedural fairness by Tribunal in not accepting a submission put to it jointly by the parties
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)s 44(1) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth)s 6A, s 120A Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Veterans' Affairs (1994-95 Budget Measures) Legislation Amendment Act 1994 (Cth) Federal Court Rules O 54 r 2A, r 3(2) Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Saxby Bridge Financial Planning Pty Ltd (2003) 133 FCR 290 cited Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investment Commission (2003) 76 ALD 321 cited Clements v Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee (2003) 131 FCR 28cited Comcare v Etheridge [2006] FCAFC 27 cited Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 cited HBF Health Fund Inc v Minister for Health and Ageing [2006] FCAFC 34 referred to Purvis v Dairy Adjustment Authority (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 38 cited Repatriation Commission v Hancock (2003) 37 AAR 383 referred to Repatriation Commission v Towns (2003) 38 AAR 77referred to EVE BROWN v REPATRIATION COMMISSION NSD 885 of 2006 BRANSON J 19 JULY 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 885 of 2006
BETWEEN: EVE BROWN
APPLICANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 JULY 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate