Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Churche v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2006] FCA 922 WARWICK JAMES CHURCHE v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION NSD 866 OF 2006 GRAHAM J 13 JULY 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 866 OF 2006
BETWEEN: WARWICK JAMES CHURCHE
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 JULY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Notice of Motion filed by the applicant on 22 June 2006 be dismissed. 2. There be no order as to costs on the Notice of Motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 866 OF 2006
BETWEEN: WARWICK JAMES CHURCHE
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE: 13 JULY 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 These proceedings were commenced by application NSD 866 of 2006 on 5 May 2006. Relief is sought in the application in respect of a decision said to have been made by the respondent on 27 April 2006 to provide a copy of the transcript of the applicant's s 19 examination under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) conducted on 14, 15 and 21 April 2005. 2 Following the investigation which led to the applicant's examination, the respondent wrote to the applicant's solicitors on 10 November 2005 stating: 'As you're aware, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ... has been conducting an investigation into the circumstances in which [an insurance company] negotiated and entered into certain ... contracts ... I write to advise that, in the view of ASIC, the admissible evidence assembled to date does not constitute a sufficient basis on which a recommendation can be made to the Commonwealth DPP to prosecute any person for a contravention of a provision of the Corporations Act ...' (emphasis added)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate