Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Chemeq Limited (ACN 009 135 264) v Chemeq Limited (ACN 009 135 264) [2006] FCA 936 CORPORATIONS – continuous disclosure obligations – contravention – failure to disclose cost increases in construction of major production facility – failure to disclose lack of commercial significance of publicised grant of patent in the United States – admission of contraventions – agreed proposed orders – agreement as to appropriate penalties – purpose of continuous disclosure requirements – principles informing penalty discretion – factors relevant to penalty in non-disclosure contraventions – approach by court to agreements as to appropriate penalties – principle of judicial restraint – not to be equated to limitations in judicial review – effect of contraventions on market for company shares – lack of dishonesty – absence of adequate compliance systems – post contravention establishment of detailed compliance system – cooperation with regulator – admission of contraventions – substantial change to composition of Board of Directors and senior management – relevance of effect of penalty on shareholders induced by non-disclosure to acquire shares or not dispose of them – declarations made – penalties imposed in terms proposed Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 674, s 676, s 677, s 111AC, s 111AD, s 111AE, s 92, s 1317DA, s 1317E, s 1317G(1A),
Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2000) 220 CLR 129 cited Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Donovan (1998) 28 ACSR 583 cited Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Alder (2002) 42 ACSR 80 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission Distribution Ltd (No 2) (2002) 190 ALR 169 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia (1999) 161 ALR 69 cited NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 619 cited Yeung K, Securing Compliance: A Principled Approach (Hart Publishing, 2004, Ch 4) AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v CHEMEQ LIMITED (ACN 009 135 264) CHEMEQ LIMITED (ACN 009 135 264) v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION WAD 294 OF 2004 FRENCH J 24 JULY 2006 PERTH IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate