Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kemp v Native Title Registrar [2006] FCA 939
NATIVE TITLE – judicial review of decision of Native Title Registrar to register indigenous land use agreement – area agreement – objection to registration by applicant – whether requirements for registration in s 24CG(3)(b) met – authorisation process where competing claims to hold native title in relation to land or waters in the area – meaning of 'all persons who hold or may hold native title in relation to land or waters in the area covered by the agreement' in s 24CG(3)(b)(i) – whether applicant, as a person who may hold native title in the area, required to authorise the agreement – Registrar's decision to register agreement set aside Aboriginal Councils and Association Act 1976 (Cth) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 24, 24CG, 24CL, 251A Davis-Hurst v Minister for Land and Water Conservation (NSW) (2003) 198 ALR 315 cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 cited KEITH KEMP v NATIVE TITLE REGISTRAR, MINISTER FOR LANDS FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES, MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES, DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION, PATRICIA DAVIS-HURST AS APPLICANT FOR THE SALTWATER PEOPLE, SALTWATER TRIBAL COUNCIL (ABORIGINAL CORPORATION) AND GREATER TAREE CITY COUNCIL NSD 35 of 2006 BRANSON J 25 JULY 2006 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 35 of 2006
BETWEEN: KEITH KEMP
APPLICANT
AND: NATIVE TITLE REGISTRAR
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR LANDS FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SECOND RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate