Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZIGE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1084
MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal – whether in all the circumstances the decision is attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by Full Court Held: Decision of Federal Magistrate not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by Full Court. Application refused. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 426A Federal Court Rules O 52 r 5(2) Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 44.12 MZWZC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 544 cited Niemann v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431 applied SZGCH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 809 cited SZIGE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 656 OF 2006
COLLIER J
18 AUGUST 2006
BRISBANE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 656 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZIGE
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: COLLIER J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 AUGUST 2006
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal is refused. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 656 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZIGE
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate