Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Futuris Corporation Limited (ACN 004 336 636) v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 1096 TAXATION – transaction purported to attract Div 19A of Pt IIIA of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – Commissioner determined Div 19A did not apply in part – notice of amended assessment issued to increase taxable income by $19 million – objection disallowed – objection decision appealed TAXATION – Pt IVA scheme involving same transaction – Commissioner determined that taxpayer had obtained a tax benefit – Commissioner made determination under s 177F of Act that included all of the amount of that tax benefit in the taxable income of the applicant – that amount added to taxable income of first amended assessment – notice of second amended assessment issued – taxpayer objection that second amended assessment double counted an amount of $19 million - objection disallowed – objection decision appealed TAXATION – Commissioner issued second amended assessment on the view that any overstated amount could be reduced pursuant to s 177F(3) of the Act – privative clause – challenge to decision under s 39B of Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – whether Commissioner's reliance on s 177F(3) resulted in an invalid decision – whether Commissioner failed to make bona fide attempt to exercise power of assessment – whether the second amended assessment failed to create a definitive liability by way of alleged double counting – whether Commissioner afforded protection under ss 175 and 177 of Act Held: Commissioner did not engage in double counting - in light of appeal proceedings in relation to both assessments Commissioner entitled to defer compensation adjustment – no evidence of bad faith –assessment created definitive liability
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 25(1), s 59(2), Pt IIIA, Div 19A, s 166, s 167, s 170(2)(b), s 174(1), Pt IVA, s 175, s 177(1), s 177B, s 177C(1), s 177F(3), (5), s 204(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Pt IVC, Div 5
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate