Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wilkshire v Bombala Shire Council [2006] FCA 1158 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs relating to amendment of proceeding and premature motion to strike out PETER JOHN WILKSHIRE v BOMBALA SHIRE COUNCIL ACD 7 OF 2006
GYLES J
31 AUGUST 2006
SYDNEY VIA VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY ACD 7 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A DELEGATE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
BETWEEN: PETER JOHN WILKSHIRE
Applicant
AND: BOMBALA SHIRE COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGE: GYLES J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 AUGUST 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY VIA VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant bear his own costs up to and including 27 April 2006. 2. The respondent bear its own costs of and concerning the preparation of and filing of the motion filed on 20 April 2006 and the affidavit in support, any costs associated with service or attempted service thereof and of the argument as to costs of the motion. 3. All other costs of the parties to date will be costs in the proceeding.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY ACD 7 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A DELEGATE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS BETWEEN: PETER JOHN WILKSHIRE
Applicant
AND: BOMBALA SHIRE COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGE: GYLES J
DATE: 31 AUGUST 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY VIA VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 17 March 2006 Peter John Wilkshire commenced an appeal from a decision of a Delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks dismissing his opposition to the registration of a trade mark in the name of the respondent, Bombala Shire Council. The appeal was listed for directions at 9.15 am on 27 April 2006. At that stage, the applicant represented himself. The notice of appeal was obviously drafted by a lay person and was not in conventional form. The address for service was ' "Grannys Well", Wilkshire Road Via Delegate NSW 2633'. 2 A notice of appearance was filed by solicitors on behalf of the respondent on 3 April 2006. On 20 April 2006 the respondent filed a notice of motion seeking the striking out of a number of grounds in the notice of appeal and an order that 'the applicant file and serve within 14 days of this order a statement which identifies with precision the grounds on which the respondent's application for registration is opposed'. The motion was supported by an affidavit of a solicitor sworn on 19 April 2006. The only substantive matter in that affidavit was as follows: 'The Notice of Appeal includes various grounds relating to issues of alleged bias and collusion which the Respondent considers to be irrelevant to the matters before the Court on the appeal. On behalf of the Respondent, I request that the Court make orders sought by the Respondent in the Respondent's Notice of Motion dated 18 April 2006.' The notice of motion was made returnable at 10.15 am on 27 April 2006. 3 On 26 April 2006 a notice of appointment of solicitor was filed on behalf of the applicant. On that day, the Court was presented in chambers with consent short minutes of order signed by the solicitors for the parties as follows: '1. If not filed and served beforehand, the applicant file and serve a notice of appointment of solicitor by 4pm on 27 April 2006.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate