Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities & Investments Commission, In the Matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd ACN 099 071 968 (No 9) v Carey [2006] FCA 1242
CORPORATIONS – freezing orders affecting property of members of corporate property group – liberty to third parties to apply – option to purchase valuable land – held by member of corporate group as assignee from another member of corporate group – assigned option subject to freezing order – assignor company subject to fixed charge over 'land' and other property classes – assignment of option without notice to chargee – receivers appointed to assignor company under charge – application to vary freezing orders to enable receivers to assert and exercise rights to option held by assignee company – whether appropriate to determine substantive rights as an incident of protective proceedings under s 1323 of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – urgency - option due to expire within five weeks of hearing – unresolved question as to validity of option against Responsible Entity for syndicate of investors in relation to land – whether appropriate to make declaration as to whether charge over option fixed or floating at creation – discovery of documents – whether discovery should be ordered in favour of assignee company – relevance to commercial context of charge – relevance to construction of charge – whether charge fixed or floating – criteria for characterisation – case of urgency – no useful purpose served by discovery – discovery oppressive in circumstances of urgency - declaration made – charge fixed – freezing orders varied Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1323 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Australian Securities and Investments Commission, In the Matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Carey (No 3) (2006) 57 ACSR 307 cited Barba v Gas & Fuel Corporation of Victoria (1976) 136 CLR 120 cited London and South Western Railway Co v Gomm (1882) 20 Ch D 562 cited In re Yorkshire Woolcombers Association [1903] 3 Ch 284 cited United Builders Pty Ltd v Mutual Acceptance Ltd (1980) 44 CLR 673 cited Illingworth v Houldsworth [1904] AC 355 cited Agnew v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2001] 2 AC 710 cited Re Spectrum Plus Limited [2005] 2 AC 680 cited Waters v Widdows [1984] VR 503 cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v LAI Corporation Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [1987] WAR 15 cited Boambee Bay Pty Ltd (In liq) v Equus Financial Services Ltd (1991) 6 ACSR 532 cited Hanson Construction Materials v Vimwise Civil Engineering [2005] NSWSC 880 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate