Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Amcor Packaging (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union of Australia [2006] FCA 1265
INDUSTRIAL LAW – interlocutory application (to prevent industrial action) – principles applicable – whether serious question to be tried – whether balance of convenience favours grant of interlocutory relief – consideration of appropriate orders Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 494, 496, 838 Amcor Packaging (Australia) Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2002] FCA 127 discussed Australian Industry Group v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (unreported, Madgwick J, 17 November 1998) cited Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 cited Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 1) (1985) 5 FCR 464 cited Epitoma Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (1984) 3 FCR 55 cited Mobileworld Operating Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2005] FCA 1365 considered Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) (1998) 195 CLR 1 cited Transfield Construction Pty Ltd v Automotive Food, Metal, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2002] FCA 1413 cited AMCOR PACKAGING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD v THE AUTOMOTIVE, FOOD, METALS, ENGINEERING, PRINTING AND KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION OF AUSTRALIA VID 880 OF 2006
MIDDLETON J
11 AUGUST 2006
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 880 OF 2006
BETWEEN: AMCOR PACKAGING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: THE AUTOMOTIVE, FOOD, METALS, ENGINEERING, PRINTING AND KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: MIDDLETON J DATE OF ORDER: 11 AUGUST 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate