Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment & Workplace Relations [2006] FCA 1381
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Tribunal dismissed application as frivolous and vexatious – Tribunal directed that applicant not bring any further application regarding particular social security benefits without leave – whether Tribunal erred in law – whether Tribunal entitled to have regard to entire history of proceedings. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 42B, 42B(1)(b), 44 Attorney-General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 cited Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Heinrich [2003] FCA 540 cited Freeman v National Australia Bank Ltd [2006] FCAFC 67 discussed Granich & Associates v Yap [2004] FCA 1567 cited Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; (1843) 67 ER 313 applied Horvath v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1999] FCA 504 cited Hunters Hill Municipal Council v Pedler [1976] 1 NSWLR 478 cited Jones v Skyring (1992) 109 ALR 303 cited Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 applied Ramsey v Skyring (1999) 164 ALR 378 cited Secretary, Department of Social Security v Cunneen (1997) 78 FCR 576 referred to Singh v Secretary, Dept of Family & Community Services[2001] FCA 1281 referred to Singh v DFCS [2003] FMCA 566 referred to Singh v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services [2004] FCA 1685 referred to Singh v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2005] FCA 1625 referred to Singh v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2006] FCA 189 referred to MOHINDER SINGH v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS VID 843 OF 2006
WEINBERG J
23 OCTOBER 2006
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 843 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate